Actor Nora Fatehi has reportedly told a Delhi court that Sukesh Chandrasekhar’s wife, Leena Paulose, arranged her appearance at a Chennai event in December 2020 and later introduced her to Sukesh over a phone call.
Bollywood actor Nora Fatehi has provided an account of her first interaction with Sukesh Chandrasekhar while appearing as a witness before a Delhi court in the ₹200-crore extortion case involving him.
According to the supplied court report, Nora told the court that she first met Sukesh’s wife, Leena Paulose, during a charity event in Chennai in December 2020.
She said Leena had arranged her participation through an entertainment agency and introduced her to Sukesh over the telephone.
The actor also described how the couple allegedly offered her a car as a gift during their initial interaction.
Her account was presented before Additional Sessions Judge Gagandeep Singh as part of the proceedings in the case.
The testimony provides further detail about Nora’s contact with the individuals involved in the investigation, although the allegations and their legal significance remain matters for the court.
Nora Fatehi Explains Her First Contact With Sukesh Chandrasekhar
Nora reportedly told the court that her first interaction with Sukesh was not an in-person meeting.
Instead, she said she spoke to him over the phone after meeting his wife at an event in Chennai.
The actor explained that she had been booked to participate in the programme in December 2020.
According to her testimony, Leena Paulose was the organiser and had engaged her services through Exceed Entertainment.
Nora stated that the booking was for a charity event where she appeared as an artiste.
She said she met Leena for the first time at the event itself.
This distinction is important because her testimony concerns how she came into contact with the couple rather than an established prior relationship.
What Happened at the Chennai Event in December 2020?
Nora described the arrangements surrounding the event while explaining the circumstances of her visit.
She reportedly told the court that the event had been coordinated through a professional agency.
As an entertainer working in India, she explained, bookings were generally handled through her management representatives rather than through direct personal arrangements.
The actor said her professional team travelled to Chennai for the programme.
Although she did not receive a performance fee for the charity event, she stated that the organisers covered expenses connected with the appearance.
These reportedly included transportation, staff costs, hair and makeup arrangements, and accommodation.
Nora said the team stayed at a five-star hotel for one night.
Her account was intended to explain the nature of the booking and the arrangements made before she met Leena.
Nora Says She Did Not Receive a Fee for the Event
One of the details highlighted in the testimony was Nora’s statement that she had not been paid an appearance fee.
She reportedly explained that entertainment bookings usually followed a formal process involving management agencies.
According to the actor, fees for professional engagements would ordinarily be handled through the relevant company.
For the Chennai event, however, she said she received no performance payment.
Instead, the organiser allegedly paid for the logistical requirements associated with her participation.
The distinction between a professional fee and reimbursement or coverage of expenses may be relevant to investigators examining financial arrangements.
However, the supplied account does not establish how the court will assess these details.
Nora’s statements should therefore be reported as testimony rather than treated as final findings.
Leena Paulose Allegedly Visited Nora’s Hotel Room With Gifts
Nora also described an interaction that reportedly occurred while she was preparing for the event.
According to her testimony, members of her team informed her that Leena wanted to meet her along with some family members.
Nora said Leena subsequently visited her hotel room accompanied by other individuals, including two videographers.
The group was allegedly carrying gifts.
During the meeting, Leena introduced herself as the owner of a business called Nail Artistry Salon.
Nora’s account suggests that the interaction was presented as a meeting between the event organiser and the invited celebrity guest.
The actor then described a telephone conversation that allegedly followed.
How Sukesh Chandrasekhar Was Introduced to Nora Fatehi
According to Nora’s statement, Leena told her that her husband wanted to speak with her.
Leena then reportedly called Sukesh and placed the conversation on speakerphone.
During the call, Sukesh allegedly thanked Nora for attending the event and expressed interest in arranging additional engagements in the future.
Nora’s account indicates that this was her first conversation with him.
The actor did not describe the call as an earlier established personal association.
The circumstances of this introduction form part of her explanation to the court about how she initially came into contact with the couple.
Nora Fatehi Describes Alleged Car Gift Offer
Another significant part of the testimony concerned an alleged offer of a car.
Nora reportedly told the court that Leena mentioned gifting her a vehicle during the telephone conversation.
According to her account, Sukesh also encouraged her to accept the car.
This claim has attracted attention because gifts and financial transactions involving individuals connected to the investigation have been subjects of scrutiny.
However, an offer to give a vehicle and the actual transfer of ownership are different events.
The supplied testimony does not establish whether Nora accepted the offer, whether a vehicle was transferred or how investigators ultimately characterised any related transaction.
Those questions require examination of the complete evidence and official court record.
It would therefore be inaccurate to treat the described conversation alone as proof that Nora received the vehicle.
What Did Nora Do After the Conversation?
Nora reportedly told the court that she proceeded with her scheduled professional engagement after the interaction.
According to her account, she and her team attended the event where she participated as a chief guest.
She said she judged a dance programme during the gathering.
This part of her testimony provided context for her presence in Chennai and the purpose of the booking.
The supplied report does not include further details about the programme’s organisers, the participants or any payments associated with the charity event beyond the expenses Nora described.
Why Was Nora Fatehi Called to Court?
Nora appeared as a listed witness in the criminal proceedings related to the ₹200-crore extortion case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
A witness may be asked to provide information about relevant events, communications or transactions.
Witness testimony can help the court understand how particular individuals came into contact with others connected to a criminal investigation.
However, being called as a witness does not itself establish criminal wrongdoing.
In Nora’s case, the supplied report identifies her as a witness rather than as an accused person in the proceeding described.
Her account of the Chennai event and the alleged car offer forms part of the evidence being presented before the court.
The ultimate significance of that evidence will depend on the complete proceedings and the court’s assessment.
Nora Fatehi Says Delhi Police’s EOW Questioned Her
The actor also informed the court that she had previously been contacted by the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police.
According to her testimony, investigators questioned her about Leena Paulose and Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
The EOW investigates certain financial and economic offences, including cases involving alleged fraud and financial misconduct.
Nora’s reported questioning formed part of the broader investigation connected with the case.
However, the supplied account does not provide the full record of her questioning or every statement she made to investigators.
Her court testimony should not be interpreted as a complete summary of the investigation.
Nora Explains How Her Professional Bookings Were Managed
While giving evidence, Nora reportedly discussed the process through which she accepted professional engagements.
She told the court that she was a Canadian citizen who had been working in Indian films since 2014.
The actor explained that clients seeking to book her services generally needed to coordinate through her management representatives.
She also stated that the relevant company would ordinarily handle payments.
According to the supplied account, Nora referred to T-Series in connection with her professional arrangements at the time of the Chennai event and mentioned Dharma and T-Series while discussing her work.
The precise contractual relationships and periods involved have not been independently verified.
These details provide context for Nora’s position that the Chennai engagement was arranged through professional intermediaries.
What Happened During Nora’s Earlier Court Appearance?
The supplied report also refers to an earlier hearing on November 6, 2026.
According to that account, Nora’s counsel sought an exemption from her appearance.
The court reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with her absence, emphasising the importance of complying with summons issued to witnesses.
The judge was quoted as telling her counsel:
“Don’t take the court for granted.”
The reported remarks indicate that the court expected the actor to attend and participate in the proceedings as required.
However, the complete judicial order should be checked before drawing conclusions about the reasons for her earlier absence or any procedural consequences.
Court appearances are governed by formal legal requirements, and witnesses are expected to comply with directions unless appropriate relief is granted.
When Is Nora Fatehi Expected to Appear in Court Again?
According to the supplied report, the court directed Nora Fatehi to appear again on November 30, 2026.
The report also states that she had previously been summoned on two occasions.
Further testimony or procedural developments may occur at the next scheduled hearing.
However, hearing dates can change, and the available account does not establish what evidence will be taken on November 30.
The latest court listing and any subsequent orders should be checked through official judicial records.
Until then, the statements attributed to Nora should be understood within the ongoing proceedings.
What Is the ₹200-Crore Extortion Case Involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar?
Sukesh Chandrasekhar is associated with a major criminal investigation involving allegations of extortion and financial misconduct.
The case has attracted widespread attention because of the amount involved and the reported connections between individuals under investigation and entertainment personalities.
However, different legal proceedings involving Chandrasekhar may address distinct allegations, evidence and parties.
It is important not to combine separate cases or assume that every person mentioned during an investigation faces the same legal allegations.
The specific proceeding described in the supplied report concerns Nora Fatehi’s appearance as a witness in the ₹200-crore extortion case.
The allegations against the accused remain subject to the applicable legal process.
Any conclusion about criminal responsibility must be based on the findings of the competent court.
Why Nora Fatehi’s Testimony Matters
Nora’s reported evidence offers a chronological explanation of her initial contact with Leena Paulose and Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
Her account identifies the Chennai event, the agency involved in her booking, the circumstances of her meeting with Leena and the subsequent telephone conversation.
She also addressed the alleged offer of a vehicle and the financial arrangements surrounding her professional appearance.
Such details may assist the court in examining the events relevant to the case.
However, testimony is one component of the judicial process.
Its meaning and reliability are assessed alongside other evidence, applicable law and submissions from the parties.
Reporting on the proceedings requires maintaining the distinction between an allegation, a witness statement and a judicial finding.
The Bigger Picture
Nora Fatehi’s court appearance has renewed attention on the circumstances surrounding her first reported contact with Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
According to her account, the interaction began with a professional booking arranged through an entertainment agency for a charity event in Chennai in December 2020.
She said she met Leena Paulose during that visit and was subsequently introduced to Sukesh over the telephone.
The actor also described an alleged offer of a car as a gift.
These statements form part of an ongoing criminal proceeding, and their legal implications have not been conclusively established in the supplied material.
The next reported hearing is scheduled for November 30, 2026, when the court may continue examining evidence connected with the case.
Have a story tip or feedback? Write to [email protected].
© Hunterfly.in. Original editorial content.
