Mehbooba Mufti Questions Centre’s Response as Sonam Wangchuk’s Hunger Strike Enters Critical Phase

New Delhi: Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chief Mehbooba Mufti has criticised the Union government over its response to climate activist and educator Sonam Wangchuk’s ongoing hunger strike, arguing that the absence of direct engagement raises concerns about how democratic protests are being addressed.

Wangchuk has been participating in a protest linked to demands for accountability over alleged examination irregularities and has continued his indefinite hunger strike despite warnings from medical professionals regarding his health condition.

In a statement shared on social media, Mufti said the developments at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar were deeply concerning and reflected the need for greater dialogue between policymakers and young citizens. She argued that democratic institutions should remain accessible to those seeking peaceful engagement on issues affecting students and the future of education.

“The scenes unfolding at Jantar Mantar are distressing,” Mufti said, adding that the government should actively communicate with protesters rather than remain silent. She also questioned what she described as a lack of urgency in responding to concerns being raised by demonstrators.

The protest, organised by a youth-led group, began in June and has focused on demands related to examination transparency, accountability and educational reforms. Wangchuk joined the movement several days after it began and has remained one of its most visible faces.

According to organisers, the protest includes demands for action regarding alleged examination irregularities and broader reforms aimed at restoring confidence among students and families. The group has also announced plans for additional demonstrations in the coming days.

Medical experts monitoring Wangchuk’s condition have reportedly cautioned that prolonged fasting can lead to serious health complications. Despite those concerns, Wangchuk has indicated that he intends to continue his protest unless there is a meaningful response to the issues being raised.

The Centre has not issued a detailed public response to Mufti’s remarks. Meanwhile, the debate surrounding the protest has intensified online, with supporters calling for dialogue and critics questioning the effectiveness of prolonged hunger strikes as a means of political pressure.

As the protest continues, attention remains focused on whether discussions between organisers and government representatives will take place and whether any policy announcements or assurances emerge in response to the demands being put forward.