The name Lubna Qureshi has surfaced on social media in connection with the viral video controversy involving Manoharlal Dhakad. However, there is no verified confirmation establishing that the woman seen in the circulating footage is Lubna Qureshi.
A viral video involving a man identified in reports as Manoharlal Dhakad triggered widespread discussion on social media in 2025. As the footage circulated, several social-media accounts began attaching different names and identities to the woman allegedly seen with him.
One of the names that subsequently appeared online was Lubna Qureshi.
However, claims circulating on social media should not be treated as established fact without independent verification.
How did Lubna Qureshi’s name enter the controversy?
Following the circulation of the video, posts on social-media platforms began sharing photographs of women while claiming that one of them was Lubna Qureshi.
Some posts went further and described the woman as Dhakad’s wife or as the person appearing alongside him in the viral footage.
These claims, however, have not been independently established.
The identity of a person appearing in a viral image or video cannot reliably be determined simply from social-media posts, captions or comparisons made by anonymous users.
Is the woman in the video Lubna Qureshi?
At present, there is no publicly verified evidence establishing that the woman shown in the controversial footage is Lubna Qureshi.
Neither the viral posts themselves nor social-media speculation provides sufficient evidence to authenticate the woman’s identity.
This distinction is important because several unrelated photographs and older videos can circulate alongside a trending controversy, creating misleading connections between people who may have no involvement in the original incident.
Old videos also enter the online discussion
The controversy has also been accompanied by the circulation of older videos and unrelated social-media posts.
Some accounts have attempted to connect previously published footage of women with the Dhakad controversy. In at least some cases, the material predates the 2025 incident and therefore cannot by itself establish a connection to the case.
The circulation of old footage alongside new claims can make it difficult for social-media users to distinguish genuine developments from recycled or misleading content.
What has been officially established?
The viral controversy concerns footage that circulated widely online and generated considerable discussion about the identity of the people involved.
However, claims concerning Lubna Qureshi’s alleged involvement have not been independently confirmed.
There is also a difference between a person’s name appearing in social-media posts and an official authority confirming that person’s identity.
Until credible sources or an official investigation establish the facts, claims identifying Lubna Qureshi as the woman in the footage should be treated as unverified.
Why social-media claims need to be checked
Viral controversies often generate hundreds of posts within a short period. Photographs, screenshots, old videos and unrelated accounts can become mixed together as users attempt to identify people shown in trending material.
That can result in innocent individuals being incorrectly identified.
For readers, the safest approach is to distinguish between:
- Verified information reported by credible sources
- Statements made by people directly involved
- Official findings or police statements
- Unverified claims made by social-media users
The Lubna Qureshi claim currently falls into the last category unless further credible evidence emerges.
The controversy continues to attract attention
The Manoharlal Dhakad viral-video controversy generated substantial online discussion, but the subsequent spread of additional names and photographs has made the story more complicated.
Rather than accepting social-media claims at face value, readers should wait for independently verified information before concluding who appears in the footage.
As of the available information, Lubna Qureshi’s alleged connection to the viral video remains unconfirmed.
