Speculation is rife on social media after recent reports claimed that Sangeetha Sornalingam has filed for divorce from Tamil superstar Vijay. While there has been no official confirmation from the family, unverified reports have suggested marital discord.
Amid these discussions, fans have begun decoding social media activity of actress Trisha Krishnan, linking her posts to the ongoing rumours. It is important to note that no names have been officially mentioned in connection with the alleged separation.
Why Are Fans Talking About Trisha?
Vijay and Trisha share a long professional history. The duo first appeared together in the 2004 blockbuster Ghilli, which remains a cult favourite among Tamil cinema audiences.
When Ghilli was re-released in April 2024, Trisha described the moment as “full circle” on social media, accompanying the post with heart, infinity and evil eye emojis. Some fans claim she has used a similar combination of emojis in posts connected to Vijay in the past.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Add Hunterfly on GoogleObservers also pointed out that Trisha used comparable emoji patterns while wishing Vijay on his birthdays in 2023, 2024 and 2025. Additionally, her Valentine’s Day 2024 post and birthday thank-you note featured similar symbols, further fuelling online theories.
Public Appearances Add to Speculation
The two actors were also seen together during the puja ceremony of Leo in 2024. Photos shared from the event led to renewed dating speculation among sections of social media users.
However, these interpretations remain fan-driven and speculative.
No Official Confirmation
Despite the growing chatter, neither Vijay, Trisha Krishnan nor Sangeetha Sornalingam has issued any official statement regarding the reported divorce or the rumours circulating online.
As of now, the claims remain unverified. Fans and observers continue to wait for clarity from those directly involved.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Add Hunterfly on GoogleUntil then, much of the conversation appears to be based on social media interpretations rather than confirmed facts.
